- Patriarchy or Matriarchy (P/M) is the natural arrangement of power within the society because the idealized characteristics of P/M are naturally the best for managing society. Society works best when P/M is honored.
- The other choice is naturally the worst arrangement of society because its approach yields unstable results.
Where sexism really comes in is that one gender and its characteristics is categorically better than the other regardless of individuality or context. Society is best run by women because they are not ruled by men's lust for battle. Men are best for ruling because they are not carried away by petty emotions. Each point of view is equally sexist. While it may be true that any group, in general, has a set of characteristics, its also true that any group contains all possibilities. In a group of women, some will lust for war, and in a group of men, some will seek out peace. Groups cannot be devolved into something homogeneous because that's a basic denial of humanity. Where you reduce someone to their gender, that's sexism.
Unfortunately, there's no innate characteristic that naturally makes any single person or group actually better at any ruling system. Variation means that some individuals and groups are better than others. About the only non-sexist, non-anything-ist that we can use as a meta-narrative is that a sufficient diversity of people who each bring their own competence is the best at solving any problem, especially if they can reach out and secure additional expertise when needed.
What's that called? I have no idea. I'll call it "diversitist."
- Rule best comes through a diversity of peoples, genders, experiences, and expertises.
- Insufficient diversity creates problems.
- Problems are solved by expanding diversity.
- The skills and knowledge of each contributor matters more than their race, gender, or creed.
- Nobody deserves a seat at the table for any attribute that they're born with or to.
- Sitting at the table is earned, not given.